The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2007-Mar> msg00350



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] RE: [PWE3] Proposed G.8110.1 Amendment 1 Laision response

  • From: "Hamid Ould-Brahim" <hbrahim@nortel.com>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:58:56 -0400
  • Cc: mpls@ietf.org
  • Thread-Index: Acdsiy2TBoUuQPI2RW2EZ9rFyb2MhAABhOOg
  • Thread-Topic: [PWE3] Proposed G.8110.1 Amendment 1 Laision response
  • X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:28:13 -0400
  • X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by cell.onecall.net id l2QEPhs19784

Italo, 

> 
> I feel a little bit unconfortable with the second part of the 
> proposed liaison:
> 
> "The PWE3 WG will perform a further review of G.8110.1 
> Amendment 1 and will respond in time for the ITU SG15 meeting 
> in June."
> 
> It sounds like the draft has not been read at all. I do not 
> think this is a polite message we wish to give to ITU.
> 
> I would propose to smoote a little bit the message with 
> something like:
> 
> "The PWE3 WG has not found other major issues than those 
> identified by the MFA Forum, however it will perform a 
> further detailed review of G.8110.1 Amendment 1 and will 
> respond in time for the ITU SG15 meeting in June."
> 

Since PWE3 intends to perform a detailed review of the proposal
I don't think at this point in time PWE3 is in position
to conclude that it "has not found other major issues than 
those identified by the MFA forum". 

Hamid.

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls