The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2007-Jan> msg00183



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] RE: [PWE3] Re: Y.1720 liased text

  • From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, SBCLABS" <dbrungard@att.com>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:47:25 -0600
  • Cc: mpls@ietf.org, pwe3@ietf.org
  • Thread-Index: AcdBfLlXJ3ysepdtRL2eiZpEQ95QZAABJLLwABcCmIAAf0IaoA==
  • Thread-Topic: [mpls] RE: [PWE3] Re: Y.1720 liased text
  • X-Env-Sender: dbrungard@att.com
  • X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by cell.onecall.net id l0TJgRs02890
  • X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-121.messagelabs.com!1170100052!19569747!1
  • X-Originating-IP: [134.24.146.4]
  • X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7.1; banners=-,-,-
  • X-VirusChecked: Checked

Hi Neil,

Good analysis - we still don't have the perfect technology;-) Though as
you say I am not sure what can be done of the last four options -
especially the last - by IETF. It seems to be set in stone from the
other emails on the list. At most, IETF can mention concern (as Stewart
captured in his proposal). And encourage cross-SDO review and use of
RFC4775 when considering applying/extending MPLS.

Deborah


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls