The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] Y.1720 liased text
Please could some else from the PWE3 WG take a look at the following liaison statement. https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/liaison_detail.cgi?detail_id=289 I think that we need to respond with the following, but I would like someone else to check my interpretation of their text and the IETF MPLS design. An appropriate response would seem to be: The PWE3 WG is concerned about the consented text for Y.1720 that has been liaised to us. In particular the following text in Y.1720 looks like a violation of the IETF MPLS architecture. Appendix II Packet 1+1 example realization The packet 1+1 scheme can be implemented by using a sequence as an identifier. The sequence number can be carried as the first four bytes inside the shim header of the LSP providing packet 1+1. Since the ingress and egress nodes must be aware of each LSP participating in the packet 1+1, the egress node will recognize that there is a sequence number inside the label. It will use the sequence number for selection purpose and then remove it before forwarding the accepted packet further. Note that packet 1+1 can be provided at any level of the hierarchy of a nested LSP. Figure II.1 illustrates the sequence number position behind the 4-bytes MPLS encapsulation header. This implies that the Y.1720 is proposing to place an item in the label stack that does not conform to the design of an RFC3032 label stack entry. This breaks the MPLS invariant that any item that follows an LSE with the S bit set to zero MUST be another LSE. It also breaks the guideline that any item that follows a MPLS LSE should either be an IP packet or should conform to the design described in RFC4385. It is our view that all MPLS packet designs must adhere to the design invariants and guidelines produced by the IETF and the text in Appendix II, and any technical design that conflicts with the IETF design needs amendment before Y.1720 is published in its final form. Regards Stewart _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|