The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-vasseur-mpls-3209-patherr-00.txt
Dear WG members, Some of you might recall the in-depth discussion that we had some time ago wrt to Soft Preemption. I think that we got a pretty clear consensus on the proposed solution. There was still a remaining issue related to the definition of "Hard Preemption" used in the ID. More precisely, some of you required clarifications on RFC3209 with regards to the behavior of a node upon the reception of a Path Error. Thus we have produced this ID, the aim of which is simply to clarify this aspect, thus hopping to be able to move forward on the Soft Preemption ID (of course, we will produce a new revision of the Soft Preemption ID referring to this new ID, once we'll get a consensus). Thanks. JP, Adrian and George. Begin forwarded message:
_______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls |
|