The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] ambiguity in the LDP RFC (RFC3036) ?
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Steve Yao wrote: > Could it be the case that the loopback on A wasn't announced so it is not > reachable from B? The loopbacks were reachable via ISIS. Setting up a targetted TDP session works (loopback-loopback), and setting vendor A:s implementation to do all TDP for that interface via the interface IP address also works, so there are two workarounds for the problems. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|