The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] CCAMP Last call ondraft-deoliveira-diff-te-preemption-06.txt
Hi, This draft has been developed independently and has recently been brought to the IESG for advancement as an individual submission to become an Informational RFC. I have done a first-level review and this latest revision includes updates to reflect my comments. Since the material here concerns preemption and the suggested ways to operate an MPLS-TE or GMPLS network, we are running a quick last call on the CCAMP mailing list to ensure that no-one has any objections. Please send your comments to the CCAMP list no later than noon GMT on 13th December 2006. Thanks, Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: <Internet-Drafts@ietf.org> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 8:50 PM Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-deoliveira-diff-te-preemption-06.txt >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > > Title : LSP Preemption Policies for MPLS Traffic Engineering > Author(s) : J. de Oliveira, et al. > Filename : draft-deoliveira-diff-te-preemption-06.txt > Pages : 19 > Date : 2006-11-28 > > When the establishment of a higher priority (Traffic Engineering > Label Switched Path) TE LSP requires the preemption of a set of lower > priority TE LSPs, a node has to make a local decision to select which > > TE LSPs will be preempted. The preempted LSPs are then rerouted by > their respective Head-end Label Switch Router (LSR). This document > presents a flexible policy that can be used to achieve different > objectives: preempt the lowest priority LSPs; preempt the minimum > number of LSPs; preempt the set of TE LSPs that provide the closest > amount of bandwidth to the required bandwidth for the preempting TE > LSPs (to minimize bandwidth wastage); preempt the LSPs that will have > the maximum chance to get rerouted. Simulation results are given and > a comparison among several different policies, with respect to > preemption cascading, number of preempted LSPs, priority, wasted > bandwidth and blocking probability is also included. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-deoliveira-diff-te-preemption-06.txt _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls |
|