The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] RE: Comments on draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-00.txt
Hi Jean-Louis, To re-iterate my comment in the WG, in general, node protection, whether for p2p or p2mp LSPs, is an order of magnitude less scalable than link protection. I think we should step back at this point, and request SPs and others deploying MPLS networks to share with the WG: frequencies of link failures, node software failures (node recovers), node failures (requires manual intervention), and battery explosions, to give us a sense of the importance of continuing the work on node protection. I realize that some of these figures may be sensitive, but even normalized numbers may be useful. Kireeti. ------- _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|