The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] Comments on draft-vasseur-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-00 ?
Hi JP, all Advertising within the IGP the number of 0-bw LSPs sounds useful. This would help data plane load balancing but also maybe control plane load optimization (avoid concentration of RSVP-TE states on the same LSR)? The proposed extension is quite straightforward. This implies similar IGP load as the unreserved bandwidth sub-TLVs, provided that appropriate hysterisis and dampening mechanisms are used. By the way why not also advertising the number of non-0-bw LSPs? This could also be used for control plane load optimization... Hence the work should be pursued. Regards, JL > -----Message d'origine----- > De : JP Vasseur [mailto:jvasseur@cisco.com] > Envoyé : lundi 20 mars 2006 17:15 > À : mpls@ietf.org > Objet : [mpls] Comments on draft-vasseur-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-00 ? > > Dear WG, > > Right after the presentation this morning, it was suggested > to gather feed-back on the usefulness of this ID before > moving forward. I got some feed-back off-line and on-line > (Kenji - KDDI). > > Could you tell me whether you think that it is worth being pursed ? > > Send comments if any. > > Thanks. > > JP. > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|