The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2006-Jun> msg00166



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] Re: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-06.txt [P2MP ID]

  • From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:10:03 -0400
  • Cc: mpls@ietf.org, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, p2mp@labn.net
  • X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,please include it with any abuse report
  • X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - esc71.midphase.com
  • X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
  • X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
  • X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net

George,
         Glad to see I'm not the only one who holds this opinion!

Lou

At 03:11 PM 6/28/2006, George Swallow wrote:

> > Since a tuple <Extended Tunnel ID, P2MP ID> is sufficient to identify
> > the tunnel, the same tuple is sufficient to identify the set of
> > destinations of the tunnel. Therefore, the Tunnel ID is not
> > needed to identify the set of destinations of the tunnel.
>
>I really don't understand this drive to change semantics that have been
>stable since we began working on this draft, and that are consistent
>with 3209 this late in the game.  I am TOTALLY opposed to it.
>
>...George
>
>========================================================================
>George Swallow             Cisco Systems                  (978) 936-1398
>                            1414 Massachusetts Avenue
>                            Boxborough, MA 01719


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls