The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2006-Jun> msg00161



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] Re: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-06.txt [P2MP ID]

  • From: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:11:24 -0400
  • Cc: mpls@ietf.org, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, p2mp@labn.net
  • X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
  • X-IronPort-AV: i="4.06,189,1149490800"; d="scan'208"; a="30690725:sNHT19683586"
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2006 19:10:23.0112 (UTC)FILETIME=[816BD080:01C69AE6]

> Since a tuple <Extended Tunnel ID, P2MP ID> is sufficient to identify
> the tunnel, the same tuple is sufficient to identify the set of
> destinations of the tunnel. Therefore, the Tunnel ID is not
> needed to identify the set of destinations of the tunnel.

I really don't understand this drive to change semantics that have been
stable since we began working on this draft, and that are consistent
with 3209 this late in the game.  I am TOTALLY opposed to it.

...George

========================================================================
George Swallow             Cisco Systems                  (978) 936-1398
                           1414 Massachusetts Avenue
                           Boxborough, MA 01719

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls