The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2006-Jun> msg00026



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-mpls-p2mp-te-mib-00.txt

  • From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
  • Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 02:08:43 +0100
  • Cc: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
  • Organization: Old Dog Consulting
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jun 2006 08:59:35.0103 (UTC)FILETIME=[B2D4ACF0:01C68A10]

Tom,


>I am curious about the choice of prefix for these object descriptors, a mix 
>of
> mplsTe
> mplsP2mp
> mplsMP2p
> I find this hard to follow and would prefer a single prefix (although I 
> realise
> there are ample precedents in MPLS:-)  - is there an underlying logic?

The (impeccable) logic is simply that when you bash out code in a hurry you 
make some errors in things like naming.

Adrian 



_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls