The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] Re: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-06.txt [P2MP ID]
Lou, > >[clipped...] > > > > > > > > > > The P2MP ID provides an identifier for the set of > > > > > > > > destinations of the P2MP TE Tunnel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >The last sentence above has to be deleted. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > why, what's incorrect about it? > > > > > > > > > > > >To begin with, the last sentence states that the P2MP ID, *by itself* > > > > > >"provides an identifier for the set of destinations of a given P2MP > > > > > >TE Tunnel". However, since a given P2MP ID, *by itself*, may not > > > > > >be unique, how could it unambiguously identify the set of > > > > > >destinations of such tunnel ? > > > > > > > > > > You are 100% correct, how about fixing it by saying: > > > > > "The P2MP ID together with Tunnel ID, Extended Tunnel ID provide an > > > > > identifier for the set of destinations of the P2MP TE Tunnel." > > > > > > > >Given that P2MP ID is unique within the scope of the root, why a > > > >tuple <Extended Tunnel ID, P2MP ID> is not sufficient to identify > > > >the set of destinations of a P2MP tunnel ? After all, you agreed > > > >further down that such a tuple identifies a P2MP tunnel. > > > > > > Because this would preclude the use of tunnel ID to further partition > > > the session space (as is done today for P2P-TE.) The tuple I > > > mentioned included all three. > > > >You, yourself agreed that "A combination of this address and P2MP > >ID provides a globally unique identifier for the P2MP tunnel." > > Well actually my point was: "... the uniqueness of the tuple <P2MP > ID, Tunnel ID, Extended Tunnel ID>. " > > >Since the set of destinations of a P2MP tunnel is just a part of > >the tunnel, identifying the tunnel should be sufficient in order > >to identify the set of destinations. > > right, and all three fields are needed. Could you please provide *technical* reason(s) that would explain why a combination of P2MP ID and Extended Tunnel ID is not sufficient ? Yakov. _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|