The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2006-Jul> msg00014



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] Re: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-06.txt [P2MP ID]

  • From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
  • Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 07:58:56 -0700
  • Cc: p2mp@labn.net, mpls@ietf.org, ccamp@ops.ietf.org

George,

> >       A combination of this address and P2MP ID
> >       provides a globally unique identifier for the P2MP tunnel.
> 
> I want this to be the full tuple:
> 
> <P2MP ID, Tunnel ID, Extended Tunnel ID>

That would be fine, *as long as* you provide *technical* justification(s)
on why <P2MP ID, Extended Tunnel ID> is not sufficient.

> Further we should only be calling this a globally unique identifier of a
> tunnel since the set of endpoint can change over the lifetime of the
> tunnel.

On that I certainly agree with you.

Yakov.

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls