The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2006-Dec> msg00111



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] polling for three new working group documents

  • From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:51:12 -0500
  • Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=tnadeau@cisco.com; dkim=pass (sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
  • Cc: mpls@ietf.org
  • DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2005; t=1167317474;x=1168181474; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001;h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;d=cisco.com; i=tnadeau@cisco.com;z=From:=20=22Thomas=20D.=20Nadeau=22=20<tnadeau@cisco.com>|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[mpls]=20polling=20for=20three=20new=20working=20group=20documents |Sender:=20|To:=20LE=20ROUX=20Jean-Louis=20RD-CORE-LAN=20<jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com>; bh=c7Nle3cKqaQUBwe1hirJ0xTlGcubBKg46gooF6MwdYE=;b=rWVQ13BtbLuAdt3x7GUgRyIqFJld5QK3yIzGOSotnOHltR2vWPJ08d/Hy1up7K3zwjPUVmv8ztJRksj+oMpPN3+DJ6OOSJZ0qe1eM7Gxs/U0UVtZXQ9INqwSR26/7sQV;
  • X-IronPort-AV: i="4.12,215,1165208400"; d="scan'208"; a="110438191:sNHT49501344"
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Dec 2006 14:51:10.0704 (UTC)FILETIME=[9D0EEF00:01C72A8F]


	Salut Jean-Louis,

>  Hi Loa, all,
>
>
>> draft-nadeau-mpls-interas-lspping-02.txt
>
> I support, but the processing on ASBRs in the ping mode should be
> clarified.
> It seems that section 7 only discusses the traceroute mode.

	Agreed.  We need to clarify this.

> If we want the actual forwarding path to be excercised in the ping  
> mode,
> then transit ASBRs should not process the echo request and hence  
> cannot
> update the ASBR Trace Stack.
> A solution would consist of running a LSP Traceroute so as to retrieve
> the ASBR Trace stack and then this stack could be inserted within the
> echo request in ping mode...

	Agreed.

> Also there are a lot of nits, and inconsitencies in the terminology
> along the draft (I will provide comments in a separate email).

	Yes, I will attempt to fix these once you provide
comments.

	Merci,

	--Tom


>
>> draft-nadeau-rfc4379-bis-link-bundle-00.txt
>
> Support
>
>> draft-thomas-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard-00
>
> Support
>
> Regards,
>
> JL
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On 13.12.2006 13:52 Uhr, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> we have three documents there the authors have requested that they
>>> become working group documents. All three were on the agenda in San
>>> Diego and we registered support for the documents.
>>>
>>> Please respond to the mailing list within a week whether you think
>>> they should be made working group docs or not.
>>>
>>> The documents are:
>>>
>>>
>>> draft-nadeau-mpls-interas-lspping-02.txt
>>>
>>> draft-nadeau-rfc4379-bis-link-bundle-00.txt
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> draft-thomas-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard-00
>>>
>>> /Loa and George
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@lists.ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls