The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] Comments on draft-swallow-mpls-mcast-cv-00
Tom, Thanks. I notice that draft-swallow-mpls-mcast-cv-00 is not available from the internet-drafts repository. One response inline (I've snipped the rest). Thanks Ben Thomas D. Nadeau <mailto:tnadeau@cisco.com> wrote: >> 3) Section 3.2 states >> >> "The Refresh Interval is set to a relatively long value. The root >> MUST refresh the session within this interval. The root MAY jitter >> refresh messages but the Refresh Interval serves as a hard upper >> bound on the jittering. MPLS Echo Requests which refresh the CV >> Session SHOULD be sent on average at approximately one third of the >> Refresh Interval." >> >> However Section 3.1 defines the Refresh Interval as "the minimum >> period before a refresh message is sent in milliseconds." >> >> There seems to a conflict in the two defintions, where Section 3.1 >> states it is a mininum period and Section 3.2 states that it is a >> upper bound. Which is it? > > TDN: The refresh interval for the bootstrapping messages is > supposed to be relatively long -- on the order of > multiple seconds or minutes. So the definition in section 3.2 is the correct one and the definition in section 3.1 needs changing? _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|