The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] One LDP Implementation specific questionofreceive labelmapping for prefix FECs
FYI It does go further, re-writing FEC stack processing for LSP ping to permit interpretation and matching of more specific to less specific prefixes and figuring out whether that was actually permissable in the local context (a.k.a. more specific prefix did not exist at the terminating LSR) could get truly ugly... cheers Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric W Gray [mailto:ewgray2k@netscape.net] > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:17 AM > To: DECRAENE Bruno RD-CORE-ISS; pdutta@riverstonenet.com > Cc: mpls@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [mpls] One LDP Implementation specific question > ofreceive labelmapping for prefix FECs > > > Bruno/Pranjal, > > One thing I would like to make perfectly clear in this > discussion is > that - if either or > both of you would like to write an ID that proposes changing or > extending LDP to do > what you suggest, you should do so. The suggestions you make may be > well received > by participants in the MPLS working group. > > However, you should not view this as something to > "correct" in the > current LDP > specification. The point of the current LDP specification work is to > document what is > being done in current interoperable implementations, now. > > I believe the point has been sufficiently well made by > now that the > text - as is - > represents current implementation better than the changes > you've implied > or explicitly > suggested should be made with respect to the exact match > requirement in > handling an > arriving label distribution. > > -- > Eric > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls |
|