The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] New Liaison Statement, "T-MPLS Consented Recommendatio ns"
My guess: because it is not needed for T-MPLS, since T-MPLS doesn't support label merging (aka LDP). -Shahram > -----Original Message----- > From: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS [mailto:gash@att.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:32 AM > To: Thomas D. Nadeau; mpls@lists.ietf.org > Subject: RE: [mpls] New Liaison Statement, "T-MPLS Consented > Recommendations" > > > > The OAM as specified does not meet the IETF's > > requirements for OAM specified in RFC4377. > > Y.1711 is not suitable for environments where PHP is > > enabled, > > It isn't clear why ITU-T did not also specify Y.1713 (MPLS OAM > Connection Verify Mechanism compatible with LDP, shepherded through > ITU-T by David Allan) > > Jerry > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|