The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] New Liaison Statement, "T-MPLS Consented Recommendatio ns"
Hi Scott, The tabel in G.8112 diesn't show any restriction on label range. It is in-line with RFC-3032. It just repeats which of the 32 reserved labels are already in use, and which are for FFS. It also mentions that all the remaining 2^20-32 labels could be used for T-MPLS. What restriction do you see in that? -Shahram > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott W Brim [mailto:swb@employees.org] > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 10:55 AM > To: Shahram Davari > Cc: mpls@lists.ietf.org; 'Thomas D. Nadeau' > Subject: Re: [mpls] New Liaison Statement, "T-MPLS Consented > Recommendatio ns" > > > On 04/11/2006 10:16 AM, Shahram Davari allegedly wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > 1) Reading the T-MPLS specs I didn't see any specific label > range restriction. Where have you seen this? > > It's in G.8112. > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|