The MPLS WG Archive

[Rahul Aggarwal <rahul@juniper.net>]

Hi Adrian,

Sorry for the delay.

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Adrian Farrel wrote:

> > > Could you look at the current draft and
> > > let me know whether it captures all of the requirements
> >
> > It will be great if you could point me to the text that describes the
> > requirements for P2MP OAM ?
>
> :-)
>
> I guess there is as yet no draft that covers all of the requirements for
> OAM for P2MP (TE) LSPs.
> As I recall this was also the case for P2P when the LSP Ping work started,
> but no matter.
>

> The requirements for P2MP LSP Ping are covered in the P2MP LSP Ping draft.
> Wider scoped OAM requirements will be in a draft that Tom and I plan to
> write just as soon as we have a few spare cycles.
>

I also think we need some more input from providers on this to understand the
requirements better.

rahul

> Cheers,
> Adrian
>

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls