The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2005-Mar> msg00049



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] Draft MPLS Minutes: please comment

  • From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
  • Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:07:13 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc: mpls@ietf.org

On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be wrote:

> george, concerning
>
> > V.  Extensions to G/RSVP-TE for P2MP TE LSP's  (D. Papadimitriou)
> >     draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-re-p2mp-01
> >
> >  Terminology adapted to requirements doc;
> >  Document structure has been reorganized.
> >
> >  Open Issues:
> >     1) Style usage  (SE vs FF style)
> >     2) P2MP SENDER_TEMPLATE object and FILTER_SPEC
> >     3) Review text for re-merge/cross-over conds
> >     4) Re-optimization (requires consensus whether re-opt may be done
> >           on a P2P sub-LSP and / or sub-tree basis)
> >     5) Pruning (deletion) and sub-ERO compression reorg
> >     6) Stitching mechanism
>
> point 2) i indicated that consensus has been reached, so please replace by
> "2) P2MP SENDER_TEMPLATE object and FILTER_SPEC (consensus reached)"

If consensus has been reached, shouldn't this just be removed from the
Open Issues list?

> point 6) i indicated it refers to CCAMP WG so please replace by
> "6) Stitching mechanism => cf. CCAMP WG"

And the issue is?

Kireeti.
-------

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls