The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2005-Mar> msg00047



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] P2MP LSP Ping

  • From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:22:04 -0500
  • Cc: mpls@ietf.org
  • X-IronPort-AV: i="3.91,111,1110171600"; d="scan'208"; a="41476681:sNHT4005601134"
  • X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Mar 22, 2005, at 1:00 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:

>>> Could you look at the current draft and
>>> let me know whether it captures all of the requirements
>>
>> It will be great if you could point me to the text that describes the
>> requirements for P2MP OAM ?
>
> :-)
>
> I guess there is as yet no draft that covers all of the requirements 
> for
> OAM for P2MP (TE) LSPs.
> As I recall this was also the case for P2P when the LSP Ping work 
> started,
> but no matter.
>
> The requirements for P2MP LSP Ping are covered in the P2MP LSP Ping 
> draft.
> Wider scoped OAM requirements will be in a draft that Tom and I plan to
> write just as soon as we have a few spare cycles.

	Yes, indeed we planed on doing this as one of our actions
from comments on the MPLS OAM requirements document's WG last
call.

	--Tom

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCQHBcHwfkLUURkkwRAsmHAJ9k/doUC+DXmTb6lr8Vaam47iIuygCeLVg9
7fwgHWPEjuNUib1hTpZafQk=
=Qmf6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls