The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] unsubscribe
unsubscribe -----Message d'origine----- De : mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org] De la part de neil.2.harrison@bt.com Envoyé : jeudi 3 mars 2005 16:39 À : aatlas@avici.com; swallow@cisco.com Cc : mpls@ietf.org Objet : RE: [mpls] Last Call on BCP on ECMP According to rfc3032 labels 0-15 are reserved...so its seems there is a more general point here. Further, there seem to be proposals for some of these to occur at arbitrary positions in the stack, eg draft-ietf-mpls-explicit-null-02.txt. So how does this play here? regards, Neil > We may want another or a different example of a reserved label (such > as the Router Alert or even Explicit Null) > > Alia > > At 08:07 PM 3/2/2005, George Swallow wrote: > > > "The processing of the label stack for load balancing may include > > > all MPLS labels, including those that are reserved; in > such a case, > > > the addition of a reserved label, such as the OAM label, > may result > > > in a different path being taken." > > > >I'll probably word-smith it a bit, but I'm happy to capture the > >thought. > > > >...George > > > >============================================================= > =========== > >George Swallow Cisco Systems > (978) 936-1398 > > 1414 Massachusetts Avenue > > Boxborough, MA 01719 > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|