The MPLS WG Archive

["David Allan" <dallan@nortel.com>]

Title: RE: [mpls] Last Call on BCP on ECMP

Understood,

Simply seemed to be a good place to document IMO a reasonable direction to go in, (irrespective of the existence of RFC 3429)

cheers
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Swallow [mailto:swallow@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 7:32 PM
> To: Allan, David [CAR:NS00:EXCH]
> Cc: 'mpls@ietf.org'; swallow@cisco.com
> Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call on BCP on ECMP
>
>
> Dave -
>
> > I agree with Alia that fate sharing between LSPs and
> reserved labels
> > would be a useful propery to at least START to get back (and IMO it
> > goes beyond OAM/router alert, it should have remained a design
> > intent).
> >
> > I would like to see that included in this BCP. Text to the
> effect that
> > "the NHLFE selection criteria should be unaffected by the
> presence of
> > reserved labels (0-15)..."
>
> I don't think this belongs in a BCP.  The document is
> intended to let people know what the current practice is so
> that they can figure out how to deal (cope if you like) with it. 
>
> ...George
>
> ==============================================================
> ==========
> George Swallow             Cisco Systems                 
> (978) 936-1398
>                            1414 Massachusetts Avenue
>                            Boxborough, MA 01719
>
>

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls