The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2005-Mar> msg00003



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] Last Call on BCP on ECMP

  • From: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>
  • Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:31:36 -0500
  • Cc: "'mpls@ietf.org'" <mpls@ietf.org>
  • X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
  • X-IronPort-AV: i="3.90,131,1107763200"; d="scan'208"; a="617429515:sNHT18630932"

Dave -

> I agree with Alia that fate sharing between LSPs and reserved labels would
> be a useful propery to at least START to get back (and IMO it goes beyond
> OAM/router alert, it should have remained a design intent). 
> 
> I would like to see that included in this BCP. Text to the effect that "the
> NHLFE selection criteria should be unaffected by the presence of reserved
> labels (0-15)..."

I don't think this belongs in a BCP.  The document is intended to let
people know what the current practice is so that they can figure out how
to deal (cope if you like) with it.  

...George

========================================================================
George Swallow             Cisco Systems                  (978) 936-1398
                           1414 Massachusetts Avenue
                           Boxborough, MA 01719

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls