The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2005-Feb> msg00081



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] Re: MPLS/GMPLS Change Process

  • From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@faster-light.net>
  • Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:33:07 -0500
  • Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
  • X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:25:30 -0500
  • X-pair-Authenticated: 69.37.59.162
  • X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on workhorse.faster-light.net
  • X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.1


In message <200502250539.j1P5dliu018627@bright.research.att.com>
Bill Fenner writes:
>  
>  
> We expect to talk about the MPLS/GMPLS Change Process at the
> Routing Area meeting in Minneapolis.  The main changes from the
> -00 version are the addition of the preliminary process which
> doesn't require an I-D and additional mentions of where liaisons
> fit in the process.
>  
> Let's please discuss this on the routing-discussion list, instead
> of trying to use both ccamp and mpls lists.
>  
>   Bill



Bill,

Excellent job on the liason section.  Exactly as it should be.

Curtis

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls