The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2005-Feb> msg00079



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] LSP ping query

  • From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:52:01 -0500
  • Cc: "'mpls@ietf.org'" <mpls@ietf.org>
  • X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
  • X-IronPort-AV: i="3.90,117,1107734400"; d="scan'208"; a="229224414:sNHT94839372"


> Hi ,
>         Is it possible to run trace route and LSP ping functionality 
> on PSN
> tunnels alone , which are supposed to carrying pseudowires and VPN IPV4
> information.

	If by "PSN tunnels" you mean MPLS LSPs that attach PEs, then certainly
you could. Of course, this is true as long as there is a FEC binding for
the label that is bound to that route(s).

	--Tom



>         This would require to send LSP ping packet with a single mpls 
> shim
> label on the data path , even though the edge nodes have been 
> programmed for
> two label
>         stacks .
> Manoj
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls