The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] MPLS over L2TPv3 as WG item
Very well put. I'll second that opinion. Regards, Don > -----Original Message----- > From: mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org > [mailto:mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 4:41 AM > To: Loa Andersson; W. Mark Townsley > Cc: mpls@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [mpls] MPLS over L2TPv3 as WG item > > > Well, I suppose it does not harm. But does it do any good? > > Looking at the current draft, there are no protocol > specifications and no code point definitions. The draft boils > down to a statement that the payload of an L2TP packet may be > an MPLS packet, some restatements from L2TPv3 about how the > L2TP fields should be set, and an applicability statement. > > I would suggest that this should be simply recast as an > informational draft making an applicability statement for > MPLS over L2TP. > > Regards, > Adrian > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se> > To: "W. Mark Townsley" <townsley@cisco.com> > Cc: <mpls@ietf.org> > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 9:43 AM > Subject: Re: [mpls] MPLS over L2TPv3 as WG item > > > > Working Group, > > > > the reception of the draft was a wee bit ambigious (some > no, some no > > need and some yes), with some service providers strongly in > favor. We > > would like to poll the working group on whether we want to make > > draft-townsley-mpls-over-l2tpv3-00.txt a wg doc. > > > > To make it possible to publish a working group document, > given a rough > > consensus in the wg, we need to have comments Feb 11. > > > > Send comments to the mailing list or wg chairs. We are looking for > > both positive and negative comments. > > > > /Loa and George > > > > W. Mark Townsley wrote: > > > > > > > > As requested by Loa at the last MPLS WG meeting, I have > renamed the > MPLS > > > over L2TPv3 draft as follows: > > > > > > draft-townsley-mpls-over-l2tpv3-00.txt > > > > > > With consensus confirmation from this list, I would like > to resubmit > > > this version as a WG item (preferably before the upcoming > deadline > > > for the next meeting). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > - Mark > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mpls mailing list > > > mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > > > > > > -- > > Loa Andersson > > > > Principal Networking Architect > > Acreo AB phone: +46 8 632 77 14 > > Isafjordsgatan 22 mobile: +46 739 81 21 64 > > Kista, Sweden email: loa.andersson@acreo.se > > loa@pi.se > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls mailing list > > mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls |
|