The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] Last Call on "LSP Ping"
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, George Swallow wrote: > > This is one of the best written I-Ds for a long time! Thanks. > > Section 7 > > There are several specific codepoints defined in the draft and > > marked as "to be defined by IANA". These are specific values > > within the new name spaces defined in section 7. I think it would > > help IANA if you listed all of the defined values in a central > > place (perhaps with references to the defining sections). > > Good idea. Will include. Concur. Should also make sure that there are allocation policies for all the code point spaces (e.g., fields in Downstream Mapping TLV). > > Appendix A. > > I'm sure this one has been out and round the block several times. > > Notwithstanding that the appendix is non-normative, why is it included? I > > thought we were doing no new work (apart from drafts listed in RFC3468) > > related to CR-LDP. > > Is there anyone who objects to removing Appendix A? Not me. > > Section 3.5 > > The Error Code TLV > > I think no-one came up with a use for this. Since we try not to define > > things unless we have an actual use, perhaps this TLV should be retired. > > I'll leave it to Kireeti to defend as I also suggested taking it out. Take it out. > > And a silly question. > > > > Suppose I have an RSVP-TE LSP that starts on an IPv6 LSR and ends on an > > IPv4 LSR (or vice versa). > > So I have an IPv6 Sender Template and IPv4 Session (or vice versa). > > How do I encode the Target FEC Stack? > > Or perhaps this is just an unrealistic deployment? > > Hmmm. Good luck getting a notify message back! Not something I was > planning to support. When there is an actual deployment of this, we'll re-evaluate whether we need N*M RSVP-TE TLVs (N sender templates * M sessions) or N+M TLVs that the ping-er can mix-and-match. The two TLVs for IPv4+IPv4 and IPv6+IPv6 should cover 99.314% of the cases, so we'll leave those unperturbed. We can re-evaluate this sooner, when we get to the point where we're discussing the nuts-and-bolts of the p2mp RSVP-TE ping TLVs. Kireeti. ------- _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|