The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] Host Address FEC
Tom> The proposed semantic change was to the Prefix Address FEC (not the Tom> Host Address FEC) - to make a Prefix Address with a 32-bit prefix Tom> equivalent to a Host Address FEC. This change, to make a Prefix Tom> Address FEC able to substitute for a Host Address FEC has no effect on Tom> our protocol Tom, this is not a correct understanding. Eliminating the Host Address FEC does not have any effect whatsoever on the semantics of the Prefix Address FEC. Tom> The MPLS Forum protocol needs to have the Host Address FEC as it is in RFC Tom> 3036, and uses it in the spirit of its meaning there. So you say, but it doesn't seem that way to me. Maybe you should write an Internet Draft explaining how you intend to use it. Suppose the Host Address FEC is removed from RFC 3036, and you write an Internet Draft proposing that the codepoint be reused for an MPLS Forum protocol. Can you explain why that doesn't meet your needs? _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|