The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] mpls vs IPv6
richard.spencer@bt.com wrote: > > Mitchell, > > > I was trying to generalize about arch and > > implimentations within the equiv of a 1 pager > > and and not try to write a book on the diffs. > > People can read all the RFCs if they want book > > format! > > This doesn't help anyone if your generalisations are incorrect. > > > >This is not entirely true. Although MPLS is almost always used in > > > conjunction with IP, it doesn't have to be. Sorry, I live in the real-world. How many implimentations ignore IP? What is the percentage of non-IP networks? And yes, their are always exceptions to the rule and we should be aware of them. > > > Conventionally, yes. We are discussing real world implimentations against the archs, not possible implimentations that don't exist... However, yes I do think it somewhat beneficial to specify the CURRENT implimentations are not necessarily limited by the archs and that a future implimentaions ?MAY? remove these limitiations.. Enough said by me on this thread, MPLS is here and their are pros and cons to using it.... Mitchell Erblich ------------------- _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|