The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] mpls vs IPv6
Hello, > With MPLS I can create MPLS VPNs, QoS can (really?) be > granted to packet flows, and routing is more faster. Forget about the "faster". Today the forwarding happens either in hardware and is wire-speed for IPv4/IPv6 as well. Or it's the same underlying mechanism in software, e.g. the "CEF" table in Cisco routers. QoS for MPLS is in first place the same as for IPv4/IPv6. You have 3 bits, like the (old) IPv4 Precedence. In theory more QoS information could be coded in the label, of course. > IPv6 has the "Flow label" field wich makes routing faster again, the "faster" doesn't matter with today's ASICs in place. > and has less header overhead than ipv4 (or mpls+ipv4) n*4+20 vs. 40 - less overhead? > And i think flow label could have the same use as > the mpls label value... > > How is MPLS to IPv6 related? as already answered: the same as MPLS to IPv4. Well, there is always a difference between theory and implementation. MPLS needs LDP (and RSVP depending on what you do), LDP uses IP UDP and TCP. Although informations within are "TLV" coded and thus expandable I haven't seen any IPv6-based LDP on my Cisco so far. Read: you may have IPv4 to run protocols like LDP to finally run MPLS carrying IPv6 packets. > Are they technologies that have nothing to do with each other? From a generic point of view: correct. > Or MPLS can bring new functionalities to IPv6 networks (like to IPv4), > and > so mpls+ipv6 would have a sense? exactly. Hope I don't start a religious war now but look upon IPv6 as an IPv4 with larger addresses, a more structured approach to "ip options", avoiding fragmentation (on transit routers) and such. In short: more addresses ;-) > And if so, what are the benefits? Same as for IPv4: TE capabilities, allows you to integrate ATM into your IP packet network, [...]. > IPv6 has all what mpls+ipv4 has (separeted flows to support qos > VPNs faster routing) and so mpls would have no further use? Don't see that IPv6 has any VPN support (other than IPSec which IPv4 supports as well). Regards, Marc -- Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de> Powered by *BSD ;-) _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|