The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] For your review - Issues/errors/clarifications in RFC3 036
Title: Neil, What you ask should only be a concern if an implementation is either sloppy in allocating labels or not particularly careful about re-allocating them. There is a "window of opportunity" if an implementation re-issues labels on a time scale similar to expected packet inter-arrival time for traffic using that label (either before or after the re-issue). There is also a window of opportunity if the same label is somehow issued in two separate contexts and the LSR is not able to correctly recover context when it subsequently receives ambiguously labeled packets. The first window is avoidable by a robust implementation. The second window only exists for a broken implementation. This is the reason why I feel we are making a big deal out of nothing very much. :-) -- Eric neil.2.harrison@bt.com wrote: Loa, I was meaning in general, ie labelled pkts. Just want to check nothing is being overlooked here. regards, Neil-----Original Message----- From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.se] Sent: 08 October 2004 11:19 To: Harrison,N,Neil,IKR2 R Cc: ewgray@GraIyMage.com; Nick.Weeds@dataconnection.com; mpls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [mpls] For your review - Issues/errors/clarifications in RFC3 036 Neil, are you talking about packets exchange over the TCP connection between two LDP peers, or (labeled) packets in genral? /Loa neil.2.harrison@bt.com wrote: _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|