The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2004-Oct> msg00034



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] For your review - Issues/errors/clarifications in RFC3 036

  • From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
  • Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:19:01 +0200
  • Cc: mpls@ietf.org, ewgray@GraIyMage.com
  • User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803

Neil,

are you talking about packets exchange over the TCP connection
between two LDP peers, or (labeled) packets in genral?

/Loa

neil.2.harrison@bt.com wrote:
> Eric,
> <Snipped>
>  
> 
>>Not if the downstream router sends a label withdraw as an appropriate
>>recovery response to getting a packet with a label that is invalid.
> 
> 
> Is there not a possibility that packets might end up at the wrong
> destination for other (defect) reasons?  And in such a case sending a
> label withdraw seems the wrong action...comments?
> 
> regards, Neil
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
> 

-- 
Loa Andersson

Principal Networking Architect
Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson@acreo.se
                                            loa@pi.se

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls