The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2004-Oct> msg00033



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] For your review - Issues/errors/clarifications in RFC3 036

  • From: neil.2.harrison@bt.com
  • Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:05:09 +0100
  • Cc: mpls@ietf.org
  • Thread-Index: AcSsx14s9gp7B99oTx+fssHyzqJ8kAAVVl1Q
  • Thread-Topic: [mpls] For your review - Issues/errors/clarifications in RFC3 036
  • X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by cell.onecall.net id i98A3Ym09980
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Oct 2004 10:05:09.0642 (UTC)FILETIME=[4B416EA0:01C4AD1E]

Eric,
<Snipped>
 
> Not if the downstream router sends a label withdraw as an appropriate
> recovery response to getting a packet with a label that is invalid.

Is there not a possibility that packets might end up at the wrong
destination for other (defect) reasons?  And in such a case sending a
label withdraw seems the wrong action...comments?

regards, Neil


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls