The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption-02.txt
On Thu, 13 May 2004, George Swallow wrote: > Whether it needs to be a separate draft or not remains to be seen. But > it would be most helpful if someone could draft some text and get a > discussion going on the list. Discussion points: a) does 3209 (as implemented today) imply hard or soft preemption? b) should the baseline preemption policy for 3473 follow whatever we agree that 3209 implies? Can we get consensus on these points before we proceed? Kireeti. -------
|
|