The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption-02.txt
hi, this doesn't mean that they not have to be correctly documented as proposed in point 6 of adrian's mail: "> 6. We were looking for a solution that > a. documented more clearly the expected behavior of a 3209- > conformant implementation > b. allowed soft and hard pre-emption to be achieved without > substantial modification to code structure. > c. was extensible to GMPLS without requiring a change to the > procedures described in 3473." from that perspective <draft-farrel-mpls-preemption-01.txt> is more than certainly addressing this point thanks, - dimitri. Kireeti Kompella wrote: > On Mon, 10 May 2004, Matthew R. Meyer wrote: > > >>I see little value and lots of pain in changing the default >>preemption methods of the overwhelming majority of the >>installed code base of MPLS boxes. I see it unnecessarily >>stalling soft preemption, and I prefer that be avoided. >> >>So I would fall in the 'happy where things stand' group. >>(But all that should have been evident anyway). > > > Ditto. > > Kireeti. > ------- -- Papadimitriou Dimitri E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be E-mail : dpapadimitriou@psg.com Webpage: http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/ Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium Phone : +32 3 240-8491
|
|