The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption-02.txt
In message <40A00965.7020704@marconi.com>, David Charlap writes: > Adrian Farrel wrote: > > > > According to RFC3209 what is the correct behavior of an upstream LSR when i > t receives a > > PathErr?Should it: > > - forward the message but retain Path and Resv state > > Yes > > > - forward the message and retain Path state but discard Resv state > > - forward the message and retain no state > > - something else. > > References would help. > > Unless a specific PathErr/ResvError's specification says otherwise, you > should forward error messages to the appropriate ingress/egress node(s). > The edge nodes should do all the real work. > > See RFC 2209 - message processing rule for RSVP. Section 2. > > PathError: > > ... > > PERR MESSAGE ARRIVES > > o Search for a PSB whose (SESSION, SENDER_TEMPLATE) pair > matches the corresponding objects in the message. If no > matching PSB is found, drop the PERR and return. > > o If the previous hop address in the PSB is the local API, > make an error upcall to the application: > ... > Otherwise, send a copy of the PERR message to the PHOP IP > address. > > o Drop the PERR message and return > > ResvError: > > ... > > RERR MESSAGE ARRIVES > > A RERR message arrives through the (real) incoming interface > In_If. > > o If there is no path state for SESSION, drop the RERR > message and return. > > o If the Error Code = 01 (Admission COntrol failure), do > special processing as follows: > ... > (description of blockade-state algorithm snipped) > > o Execute the following for each RSB for this session whose > OI differs from In_If and whose Filter_spec_list has at > least one filter spec in common with the FILTER_SPEC* in > the RERR message. For WF style, empty FILTER_SPEC* > structures are assumed to match. > > 1. If Error_Code = 01 ... > (special handling for blockade procedure snipped) > > 2. If NHOP in the RSB is the local API, then: > > - If the FLOWSPEC in the RERR message is strictly > greater than the RSB Flowspec, then turn on the > NotGuilty flag in the ERROR_SPEC. > > - Deliver an error upcall to application: > ... > and continue with the next RSB > > 3. If the style has wildcard sender selection... > (snip - WF is not applicable to MPLS) > > 4. Create a new RERR message containing the error flow > descriptor and send to the NHOP address specified by > the RSB. Include SC.Out if the style has wildcard > sender selection. > > 5. Continue with the next RSB > > o Drop the RERR message and return. > > -- David But you may not want to rely on this behaviour (or implement it for that matter since it holds onto resources that just lead to a blackhole downstream) because some vendors believe that the microflow-RSVP behaviour above does not apply to RSVP-TE and many routers in the field discard forwarding state on RSVP-TE path-err, regardless of how many times a few people on this list cite the reference. Curtis
|
|