The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption-02.txt
George, Great to have some direction on this. Thanks. One point from what you write... According to RFC3209 what is the correct behavior of an upstream LSR when it receives a PathErr?Should it: - forward the message but retain Path and Resv state - forward the message and retain Path state but discard Resv state - forward the message and retain no state - something else. References would help. Thanks, Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Swallow" <swallow@cisco.com> To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Cc: "Matthew R. Meyer" <mmeyer@gblx.net>; "Matthew Meyer" <mrm@gblx.net>; "'mpls@uu.net'" <mpls@UU.NET>; <swallow@cisco.com> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 9:17 PM Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption-02.txt > This thread has been quite for some time. I'd like to see where the > workgroup is. > > Also, as the primary author of RFC3209 I like to state that I believe > the RFC defines hard prememption, since it says one should send a RESV > Err message and doesn't say anything about setting the InPlace bit > (which I consider to be an exception that would need to be called out). > Further there is no discussion of > > a) lowering the forwarding priority > b) how long to allow the situation to persist if the Source of the TE > takes no corrective action. > > However, I will take a mea culpa on the draft being less than completely > clear. > > > But, if the WG is happy with the existing situation and drafts that is > > fine (although someone should write a BCP to ease the interpretation > > of RFC3209). > > I don't think a BCP is needed, but any new RFC we produce will need to > include an applicability statement which includes the consensus > interpretation of RFC3209. > > So the question is, as Adrian put it, is "the WG is happy with the > existing situation and drafts"? > > ...George > > ======================================================================== > George Swallow Cisco Systems (978) 936-1398 > 1414 Massachusetts Avenue > Boxborough, MA 01719 > > >
|
|