The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Last call on draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption-02.txt
> >
> I think I see you point now. Let me rephrase it, to double
> check my understanding. The idea is to do hard preemption
^^^^^ I meant soft-preemption
> anyway, if the over-booking resulting from it is not terrible. In the best
> case, we get nice behavior for everyone, in the worst case (head-end
> doesn't support soft preemption) then the timer will take care of it.
> Right?
|
|