The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Correction of Explicit Null specification in RFC 3032
Hi Eric, > >Condition L states that if B receives an MPLS packet from A, >and if the top >incoming label on that packet is L2, then the packet has only >a single label >stack entry. > >Whether this condition holds depends on what has happened >to the packet >before it gets to B. > >The problem arises if the condition doesn't hold, but L1 is >explicit null. If C has distributed an Explicit NUll Label (L1) for FEC F (F presumably is a set of IP prefixes) to B, then it means that C is the egress LER for that FEC, meaning that C wants to forward packets destined to FEC F based on their IP addresses. If B has distributed a label (L2) for FEC F to A, then it is impossible for A to send a packet with more than 1 label (label L2) to B. Because if A does that, then A effectively wants the second label to terminate somewhere downstream of C, in which case C knows that it is not the egress LER for FEC F and therefore it should not distribute the explicit null label for FEC F to B. Am I missing something? -Shahram
|
|