The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2004-Dec> msg00026



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-sig-requirement-00.txt

  • From: Monique Morrow <mmorrow@cisco.com>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 07:55:19 -0500
  • User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.0.0.040405
  • X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2004 12:55:19.0887 (UTC)FILETIME=[539AADF0:01C4E75C]

I support this recommendation Tom -- this would be most efficent.

/monique


On 21/12/04 7:27 am, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> I have a comment on draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-sig-requirement-00.txt.
> The paragraph below seems to on the one hand, have no
> requirements as is stated in the last paragraph, does
> give a requirement. I suggest that this document simply
> refer to draft-ietf-mpls-oam-requirements-05.txt, since the WG
> agreed to include all MPLS OAM-related requirements in
> this draft.
> 
> --Tom
> 
> 
> 4.18 P2MP MPLS OAM
> 
>     Management of P2MP LSPs is as important as the management of P2P
>     LSPs.
> 
>     The MPLS and GMPLS MIB modules MUST be enhanced to provide P2MP TE
>     LSP management.
> 
>     In order to facilitate correct management, P2MP TE LSPs MUST have
>     unique identifiers.
> 
>     OAM facilities will have special demands in P2MP environments
>     especially within the context of tracing the paths and connectivity
>     of P2MP TE LSPs. The precise requirements and mechanisms for OAM are
>     out of the scope of this document. It is expected that a separate
>     document will cover these requirements.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls