The MPLS WG Archive

[Sam Munzani <smunzani@comcast.net>]

> Sort of. The part up to tunnel lookup is correct. TOS stamping takes 
> place on the CE along with some sort of rate limiting usually. Mapping 
> the packets to tunnels would be done on a routing basis I believe. If 
> I’m not mistaken you can also use half-duplex VRF to do this as well. 
> As the CE TOS bit is encapsulated in the MPLS info the experimental 
> bit will be used. Make sense?
>
What mechanism can ensure CE will not setup TOS bit differently than 
they paid for? You may not have control on their equipments.

Sam

> Jordan Britnell, CCNA
>
> IP Technology Research
>
> BCE/Bell Canada
>
> (416) 215-3729
>
> _jordan.britnell@bell.ca <mailto:jordan.britnell@bell.ca>_
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* kurien_joseph@agilent.com [mailto:kurien_joseph@agilent.com]
> *Sent:* December 9, 2004 12:16 PM
> *To:* Britnell, Jordan (5000008); kurien_joseph@agilent.com
> *Cc:* mpls@ietf.org
> *Subject:* RE: [mpls] Applying Qos on VPNs
>
> Does it imply that the CEs linked to the ingress PE would send IP 
> packet’s TOS field to mark a QoS service.
>
> And additionally the PE would lookup the TOS field on all its inbound 
> CE interfaces and mark EXP bit and forward them to any of the TE 
> tunnels that which may have an EXP bit mapping?
>
> Thanks
>
> Kurien
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* jordan.britnell@bell.ca [mailto:jordan.britnell@bell.ca]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 09, 2004 8:46 AM
> *To:* kurien_joseph@agilent.com
> *Subject:* RE: [mpls] Applying Qos on VPNs
>
> Absolutely. You can use half-duplex VRF routing as well as MPLS 
> experimental bits to define how you would like traffic from a customer 
> to be handled. A search on Cisco’s site will show you the necessary 
> steps.
>
> Jordan Britnell, CCNA
>
> IP Technology Research
>
> BCE/Bell Canada
>
> (416) 215-3729
>
> _jordan.britnell@bell.ca <mailto:jordan.britnell@bell.ca>_
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org 
> [mailto:mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *kurien_joseph@agilent.com
> *Sent:* December 9, 2004 11:25 AM
> *To:* mpls@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [mpls] Applying Qos on VPNs
>
> Can QoS be applied to Layer 3 MPLS VPNs in such a manner that, two 
> customers connected to the same ingress PE router but offered two 
> types of services like GoldVoIP and SilverVoIP and two TE tunnels 
> having different Path options but terminating together on a common 
> egress PE?
>
> Since the Egress PE for the both VPNs is the same, is it possible to 
> have VPN traffic classified and routed to different tunnels?
>
> Could someone pass a link to any cisco or juniper configuration guide ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Kurien
>
> R & D Engineer,
> MPLS/VPN Assurance
> OSSD,
> Agilent Technologies.
>
> Tel : 916 788 6678 ( TELNET 788 6678)
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpls mailing list
>mpls@lists.ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>  
>


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls