The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] Re: LSP ping TLV definition: copy-paste error?
Hi Eduard, On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 E.T.Metz@telecom.tno.nl wrote: > It looks like a copy-paste error got into the mandatory/optional TLV > definition in the LSP ping draft (draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-07.txt): > > "Types with the high order bit not set (i.e., 1) are mandatory TLVs ..." > "Types with the high order bit not set (i.e., 0) are optional TLVs ..." > > Probably should be: > "Types with the high order bit not set (i.e., 0) are mandatory TLVs ..." > "Types with the high order bit set (i.e., 1) are optional TLVs ..." Good catch! Will fix in the next version (you are right). Kireeti. ------- _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|