The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2004-Aug> msg00031



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[mpls] Requesting your feedback - issues/errors/clarifications

  • From: Ina Minei <ina@juniper.net>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: mpls@ietf.org, vach.kompella@alcatel.com


>
> > Issue: do we really have to send all FECs in our database whenever we
> > have an LDP session between two peers?
>
> This should not be a requirement of the protocol spec, the application which
> is using the protocol should determine which FECS get sent.

	I agree. This is not a specification issue, but rather a
best-practice based on the application for which the protocol is used.
If you only need the loopbacks as FECs for your application, then it is
best if you _ask_ LDP to only redistribute the loopbacks, because it will
make your network easier to troubleshoot.

				Ina


>
> > Issue: with all the combinations of Downstream Unsolicited, Downstream
> > on Demand, Ordered Control, Independent Control, etc., it makes sense to
> > define a mandatory combination.  DU/OC seems to be the favored one.
>
> I believe  this would  put a majority  of the  deployed LDP speakers  out of
> spec.  Such a change cannot be made as part of going to DS.
>

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls