The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] Requesting your feedback - issues/errors/clarifications
> > > Issue: do we really have to send all FECs in our database whenever we > > have an LDP session between two peers? > > This should not be a requirement of the protocol spec, the application which > is using the protocol should determine which FECS get sent. I agree. This is not a specification issue, but rather a best-practice based on the application for which the protocol is used. If you only need the loopbacks as FECs for your application, then it is best if you _ask_ LDP to only redistribute the loopbacks, because it will make your network easier to troubleshoot. Ina > > > Issue: with all the combinations of Downstream Unsolicited, Downstream > > on Demand, Ordered Control, Independent Control, etc., it makes sense to > > define a mandatory combination. DU/OC seems to be the favored one. > > I believe this would put a majority of the deployed LDP speakers out of > spec. Such a change cannot be made as part of going to DS. > _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|