The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [mpls] PCE BOF - Thursday August 5, 13:00 to 15:00
At 02:19 PM 8/3/2004 -0700, Bala S Venkata wrote: >Thanks Adrian. If fixing a broken link can get me higher 'competence' >ratings, I ought to have a talk with my Manager to better my next review :) > >>Thanks Bala, >> >>Your competence is greater than mine. >> >>Adrian > >Coming to the PCE BOF slides, > >1. I see that in the "Overvew" section (slide 4) there is some reference to >PCE, PCS...what did you mean by "PCS (S=Server)-> PCE" ? I have also >seen references to PCC and PCS...do they apply only in the context of >distributed path calculation ? PCS is the old terminology, this is what I'll explain here. >2. Is RSVP the only signaling protocol between an LER and a PCE ? Or >is it like there are no assumptions made abt the communication between >LER and PCE ? (maybe this is my lack of prior knowledge but the draft >on PCE signaling "draft-lee-mpls-path-request" mentioned in Slide 26 >seems to have expired ??) The purpose of the BOF are listed in slides 39, not to discuss possible solutions. To specifically answer your question, there is one draft proposing to use RSVP between an LSR and the PCE, but this is one solution, there are other proposed alternatives. JP. >tx > >/bala > >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Bala S Venkata" >><balavenkata@netscape.net> >>To: <mpls@ietf.org>; <jvasseur@cisco.com> >>Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 2:01 AM >>Subject: RE: [mpls] PCE BOF - Thursday August 5, 13:00 to 15:00 >> >> >> >> >>>I found the PCE BOF slides here: >>> >>>http://home.clara.net/olddog/60/pce/pce.ppt >>> >>>Are these the ones you mentioned in your email ? >>> >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
|
|