The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2004-Apr> msg00043



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

discussion on nexthop fast-reroute drafts

  • From: Naiming Shen <naiming@redback.com>
  • Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 18:53:39 -0700
  • Cc: "Pan, Ping" <ppan@Ciena.com>, "'Naiming Shen'" <naiming@redback.com>, "'mpls@UU.NET'" <mpls@UU.NET>, "'enke@redback.com'" <enke@redback.com>, "'tian@redback.com'" <tian@redback.com>
  • X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com


Mitchell,

 ] 
 ] 	6. RSVP Bypass Nexthop Object
 ] 
 ] 		2nd sentence: "neighbor does not aware" ->
 ] 		   "neighbor is not aware"
 ] 
 ] 		3rd sentence: ""to accept with an alternative" ->
 ] 		    "to accept an alternative"
 ] 
 ] 	bit numbering..
 ] 
 ] 		Isn't the rightmost numbering of bits to start at
 ] 		the 0 bit.
 ] 
 ] 		thus bits "1" -> "0"
 ] 
 ] 		and bit "2" -> "1"
 ] 
 ] 		Or do you really wish to leave bit "0" unused.
 ] 
 ] 	I also propose that the IETF, the public public support
 ] 	dealing with these bits a implimentation to support the
 ] 	addition of NACKs from the base "Request/Ack" support.

thanks for the suggestions. we'll update in the next version.

- Naiming