The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Sep> msg00108



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-06a.txt

  • From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:57:34 +0200
  • Cc: arunv@force10networks.com, hans@ipunplugged.com, jcucchiara@mindspring.com, cheenu@alumni.princeton.edu, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, "'Joan Cucchiara x302'" <jcucchiara@Artel.com>, "'Kireeti Kompella'" <kireeti@juniper.net>, swallow@cisco.com, loa@pi.se, mrm@riverstone.net, zinin@psg.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk

[ added MPLS WG list !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]

Inline

> >> 	The reason why the multiple fields
> >> were left in place was because someone (Arun
> >> I think) pointed out that you may want to
> >> specify a hop address AND an AS number for
> >> the case where you want to get to a specific
> >> AS *through* a specific HOP.
> >> 
> >
> >a TeHopAddress can contain an AS number.
> >So if you have a separate field for AS number what would then
> >be in the TeHopAddress??? And why would you need two addesses
> >to get to one place? SOrry I am confused here
> 
> 	Because a hop can be identified by BOTH an
> AS number and an IP address. Suppose you want to
> choose an AS via a particular interface on an
> LSR?
> 
And an IP address on another interface?
Maybe that would mean two entries in the table??

Bert
> 	--Tom