The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Invitation to discuss: "P2MP problem statement" - decision
Lou,
Yes it does. In fact, the P2MP TE LSPs can be used in
both packet based (MPLS) or non-packet based (GMPLS)
networks, as originally intended.
Dean
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET] On Behalf Of Lou
Berger
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Loa Andersson
Cc: mpls@UU.NET
Subject: Re: Invitation to discuss: "P2MP problem statement" - decision
Loa,
Just want to clarify a point: Do P2MP TE LSPs include all
GMPLS
switching types or just PSC? I think inclusion of all types is
important/goodness.
Thanks,
Lou
At 01:04 PM 9/9/2003, Loa Andersson wrote:
>WG,
>
>I have the working group consensus to ask the ADs to
>add the p-2-mp milestones to our charter. In fact we
>have only seen support :).
>
>Alex,
>
>could you start the process to add the following milestone
>the the mpls wg charter.
>
>Milestones
>
>- produce a requirement specification that defines the scope,
> requirements, and issues to resolve for how to setup a P2MP TE LSPs
> by Minneapolis 2003 meeting.
>
>- produce a small number of solution draft(s) which specify protocol
> extensions, enhancements and mechanisms for P2MP TE LSPs by spring
> 2004 IETF meeting.
>
>
>/Loa
>
>--
>Loa Andersson
>
>Mobile +46 739 81 21 64
>Email loa@pi.se
>
|
|