The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2003-Sep> msg00052



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Invitation to discuss: "P2MP problem statement" - decision

  • From: "Dean Cheng \(dcheng\)" <dcheng@cisco.com>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:37:53 -0700
  • Cc: <mpls@UU.NET>
  • Importance: Normal

Lou,

   Yes it does. In fact, the P2MP TE LSPs can be used in
   both packet based (MPLS) or non-packet based (GMPLS)
   networks, as originally intended.

Dean

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET] On Behalf Of Lou
Berger
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Loa Andersson
Cc: mpls@UU.NET
Subject: Re: Invitation to discuss: "P2MP problem statement" - decision


Loa,
         Just want to clarify a point:  Do P2MP TE LSPs include all
GMPLS 
switching types or just PSC?  I think inclusion of all types is 
important/goodness.

Thanks,
Lou

At 01:04 PM 9/9/2003, Loa Andersson wrote:

>WG,
>
>I have the working group consensus to ask the ADs to
>add the p-2-mp milestones to our charter. In fact we
>have only seen support :).
>
>Alex,
>
>could you start the process to add the following milestone
>the the mpls wg charter.
>
>Milestones
>
>- produce a requirement specification that defines the scope,
>   requirements, and issues to resolve for how to setup a P2MP TE LSPs
>   by Minneapolis 2003 meeting.
>
>- produce a small number of solution draft(s) which specify protocol
>   extensions, enhancements and mechanisms for P2MP TE LSPs by spring
>   2004 IETF meeting.
>
>
>/Loa
>
>--
>Loa Andersson
>
>Mobile          +46 739 81 21 64
>Email           loa@pi.se
>