The MPLS WG Archive

["Andrew G. Malis" <andy.malis@tellabs.com>]

Loa,

One of the reasons there may not be all that much discussion on the list is 
that there's already been extensive off-list discussion both in Vienna and 
by email that resulted in the generation of the problem statement.

Cheers,
Andy

-------

At 9/3/2003 06:33 PM +0200, Loa Andersson wrote:
>Andy,
>
>I hope you don't have the impression that I'm against adding
>this work item. What conserns me is the low level
>of partcipation on the list, would feel more conforatable if
>there were an active discussion.
>
>/Loa
>
>Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>
>>Loa,
>>Just the fact that 12 people from various organizations have shown enough 
>>interest to contribute to the existing drafts (and indeed that there are 
>>multiple proposals) demonstrates that this functionality is not a 
>>single-person or single-organization issue.  Would you feel differently 
>>if one person had written a draft and 11 others spoke up on the list?
>>Thanks,
>>Andy
>>---------
>>At 9/3/2003 09:36 AM +0200, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>
>>>Working Group,
>>>
>>>it is almost three weeks since I sent this "invitation to
>>>discuss the P2MP probelm statement". The tendency has been
>>>mostly in favor of adding p2mp mpls as a new milestone to
>>>our charter, but the discussion has not been that active,
>>>so it is hard to decide one way or another. Apart from the
>>>authors (the author groups is about 12 people) it is only
>>>one person that has taken part in the discussion.
>>>
>>>I'm aware of that we had a mailing list problem, but it is
>>>my take that the mails gone through eventually, if you think
>>>this is wrong please resend.
>>>
>>>Before deciding I would like a quick "show of hands", just
>>>positive or negative. If you have reasons not to send your
>>>response to the list, you may send it directly to me.
>>>
>>>I plan to make the call mid-next week.
>>>
>>>/Loa
>>
>
>--
>Loa Andersson
>
>Mobile          +46 739 81 21 64
>Email           loa@pi.se
>