The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Invitation to discuss: "P2MP problem statement"
Andy, I hope you don't have the impression that I'm against adding this work item. What conserns me is the low level of partcipation on the list, would feel more conforatable if there were an active discussion. /Loa Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Loa, > > Just the fact that 12 people from various organizations have shown > enough interest to contribute to the existing drafts (and indeed that > there are multiple proposals) demonstrates that this functionality is > not a single-person or single-organization issue. Would you feel > differently if one person had written a draft and 11 others spoke up on > the list? > > Thanks, > Andy > > --------- > > At 9/3/2003 09:36 AM +0200, Loa Andersson wrote: > >> Working Group, >> >> it is almost three weeks since I sent this "invitation to >> discuss the P2MP probelm statement". The tendency has been >> mostly in favor of adding p2mp mpls as a new milestone to >> our charter, but the discussion has not been that active, >> so it is hard to decide one way or another. Apart from the >> authors (the author groups is about 12 people) it is only >> one person that has taken part in the discussion. >> >> I'm aware of that we had a mailing list problem, but it is >> my take that the mails gone through eventually, if you think >> this is wrong please resend. >> >> Before deciding I would like a quick "show of hands", just >> positive or negative. If you have reasons not to send your >> response to the list, you may send it directly to me. >> >> I plan to make the call mid-next week. >> >> /Loa > > > > -- Loa Andersson Mobile +46 739 81 21 64 Email loa@pi.se
|
|